Sunday, March 20, 2022

adjective clause

Adjective clauses:

 

Here are some examples of adjective clauses from the reading “Social Networking Makes Twits of Us All”.

 

1. I had to politely step over her legs while she kept a steady stare on what must have been the most interesting thing she’s ever laid eyes on. 

 

2.  Users are spending time maintaining relationships with people they don’t really care about. 

 

3.  Dr. Laura as she is known to her many fans, believes that social networking has replaced the intimate interactions which used to occur within most American families.

 

4.  Families do not enjoy the special bond that comes from intimate interaction with those who are closest to us.  (subject pronoun)

 

5.  Will that practice cause you to forget about proper grammar and everything else you learned in grade school about writing and politeness when you email a potential employer? 

 

 

Adjective clauses:  They are a type of dependent clause which modifies a noun. 

 

1.   With subject pronouns:  who, which, that 

Joe Biden has been in politics for many years.  He is president of the US.

 

 

                    S     V

Joe Biden, who is president of the US, has been in politics for many years. 

 

 

The writing assignment was confusing. It was about social networking.

 

The writing assignment that was about social networking was confusing.

 

 

Combine these two sentences making the second one into an adjective clause:

 

My friend uses Facebook every day.  She posts pictures of her two sons.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      2. With object pronouns:  whom (who), which, that and blank 

 

Examples:

   I enjoyed the ESL class.  I took it last quarter.

 

                                                   

I enjoyed the ESL class which I took last quarter.

I enjoyed the ESL class that I took last quarter.

I enjoyed the ESL class I took last quarter.  (blank)

 

 

The book was about the beginning of the universe.  I read it last night. 

                     

The book which I read last night was about the beginning of the universe.

The book that I read last night was about the beginning of the universe.

The book I read…..

 

Combine these two sentences making the second one into an adjective clause:

 

The student had a lot of questions.  I helped her yesterday. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punctuating adjective clauses:

 

Mr. Norman, whom I took ESL 253 with, taught me a lot.

 

My mom, whom I saw yesterday, brought me dinner.

 

My mom, who got her Covid vaccine several months ago, was so happy to be able to spend time with her family again. 

 

My friend who has two boys works from home.

 

Lacie, who has two boys, works from home.

 

My brother, who lives nearby, is a teacher. How many brothers do I have?

 

My brother who lives nearby is a teacher. How many brothers do I have?

 

 

 

The woman that I saw yesterday brought me dinner. (no commas)

 

***Use commas with proper nouns. 

 

 

**You can not use “that” in a sentence which requires commas. 

***You cannot omit the object pronoun in a sentence which requires commas.

 

 

       3. With “whose” to show possession.

The student got an A.  Her paper was very clear.

 

The student whose paper was very clear got an A. 

 

Combine the following:

The teacher lives near De Anza.  I’m taking his class on Mondays and Wednesdays. 

 

 

 

 

 

Now, do some practice with adjectives clauses.   You will work in a break out room.  

 

Topic:  social networking

 

Use: who, whom, which, that, blank, whose

*I also want you to write a couple of sentences which require commas. 

 

     Example:

   Jan, who is my sister-in-law, keeps in touch with our relatives in Kentucky through Facebook.

  

 

 

 

 

 

Homework for Tuesday:

 

1.   Do chapter 8 on adjective clauses in your textbook, pages 89-98.  Do the pretest, self-check and exercises 1-4.

 

     2.  Write the revision of WA#1.  Be sure to look over the grading    rubric and make the changes that I noted. (gender inequality/equality)

 

 

 

   

Wednesday, February 23, 2022

Undocumented immigrant

 https://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/magazine/my-life-as-an-undocumented-immigrant.html

The Real Prisoner

 

"The Real Prisoner "

Imagine being kidnapped, stuck in a room for a long period of time without anyone’s notice, with no absolute daylight, no one to share the conversations with, and no hope of escape; the madness is intolerable. Being imprisoned in an unknown place is unbearably suffocating but getting trapped in one’s own mind is beyond incurable. Once a person gets drowned in his/her own mind and delusions, it is almost impossible to survive. The same concept applies to Frederick Clegg in the book, The Collector by the author John Fowles. Frederick, a lower class young man who is very fond of collecting butterflies, suddenly gets very rich after winning in the pools. After winning that money, he kidnaps a young beautiful girl named Miranda who he has never even spoken to before and keeps her in his basement as a prisoner. Although Miranda is physically being trapped by Fred, no differences are made between them since Fred is also getting immersed in his dark thoughts and self-centered perspectives. Miranda maybe physically imprisoned but she is the one in possession of her freedom in her own mind; however Fred, who is in possession of his physical freedom, is a prisoner of his own mind. 



            Fred’s limited mind on women is one of the main reasons of why he is getting trapped in his mind. As a child, he didn’t have a loving childhood; his father died when he was two and his mother abandoned him shortly after. All he knew about his mother was that she was “a woman of the streets” (5). Lack of motherly love and family warmth has shaped Fred to become the way he is and behave such insane actions. His mother being a street woman has restricted his sentiment upon women and sex. He neither has a high admiration nor has a stable relationship with any other woman, not even his aunt Annie whom taken care of him ever since his mom left. In his opinion, women are filthy creatures willing to do anything just to obtain what they want. But it is all different when it comes to Miranda. Fred highly respects Miranda, in fact she is the only girl who he ever truly values and cares about. He says, “She was not like some woman you don’t respect so you don’t care what you do, you respected her and you had to be very careful.” (36) He compares her with other women and talks about how she is different from them. He has a belief in him that a girl like Miranda, who holds high dignity in his opinion, won’t involve in sexual acts which he considers as obnoxious actions. He doesn’t want to put Miranda in the same level as his mother. When Miranda seduces him to have sex with her with the hope of it will make him free her, everything has changed; Fred no longer put her on a pedestal, he now feels contempt towards her and sees her as “common”. He explains, “I wanted her to see I could do it, then I would tell her I wasn’t going to, it was below me, and below her, it was disgusting.” (105) The sexual action of Miranda has made Fred feel disgusted towards her. He continuously keeps on saying that he doesn’t hate sex but when the time comes, he refuses to do it. He sees sex as something people with high decency won’t commit and has restricted his mind upon that idea. 


Money also plays as an important factor in the reason of why Fred acts out such insanity. His dark fantasies have been awakened only after he gets the power of money in his hand. He is consistently convincing himself that money is the main cause behind his actions of kidnapping Miranda. Instead of admitting that it is his unethical behavior, he finds an excuse and makes it seem like it is not his fault for committing such crime. He states, “. . . I’ll never do it, this is only pretending. And I wouldn’t have pretended even like that if I hadn’t had all the time and money I wanted.” (20) He wants to believe that kidnapping her isn’t his sick idea, that he only did it because he had money in his hands from winning pools. The way he keeps on mentioning, “I had the money.” (17), “After all, I had the money.” (82), also shows the fact that if it wasn’t because of money, he wouldn’t have done what he did; as if money is a supporter for his wrongful actions.  By stating, “Money is Power.” (20), he has proven his belief upon the power of money; money classifies the class among people and people tend to act under the power of it.


His hatred upon the discrimination among the class of people is also one of the logics behind him getting trapped in his own mind. He thinks that it is the divergence of classes among people which keeps him away from getting closed to anyone, when in fact he is the criminal of his own; he is the one responsible for his own actions. He lowers his status, thinking that he will never fit in the upper-class and thus bitterness starts developing in his mind. He bears a grudge against upper-class people for treating people depending on the amount of money they have or their living standards. He explains to Miranda, “I want to know you very much. I wouldn’t have a chance in London. I’m not clever and all that. Not your class.” (37) He has no confidence. He has drowned in his own delusions that no matter how rich he is, he can never be the same class as Miranda. He has an assumption in his mind that he will never get closed to Miranda by normal approach due to his “class”, so he acts out such madness, trying to get closed to her by kidnapping her. Fred is a very narrow-minded person; he doesn’t try to understand the distinct perspectives and refuses to accept them. When Miranda explains that there is no use to think about the inequality among people, he replies by saying, “Like a rich man telling a poor man to stop thinking about money . . . There was always class between us.” (39) He feels insecure about his status even though he doesn’t need to. His own assumptions have parted him away from others.


Fred wants to think that he is simple-minded, that he is a flat character but his mind is all twisted up inside, more complicated than a tangled knot which shows that he is in fact a round character. Compared to Miranda who has a broad artistic mind, wide perspective on people and knows how to appreciate the beauty of life, Fred sure is living in his own world of mess. His mind is restricted only on the concepts that he wants to believe. He is so immersed in his delusional beliefs that he is unwilling to accept the truths and refuses to change. Getting drowned in his own soul is what makes Fred the real prisoner. A person who is physically imprisoned can have at least a slight hope of escape for his/her freedom but there is no absolute hope of breakout for an emotionally trapped person; just like there is no faith of freedom for Fred. 


essay exam

 

What this handout is about

At some time in your undergraduate career, you’re going to have to write an essay exam. This thought can inspire a fair amount of fear: we struggle enough with essays when they aren’t timed events based on unknown questions. The goal of this handout is to give you some easy and effective strategies that will help you take control of the situation and do your best.

Why do instructors give essay exams?

Essay exams are a useful tool for finding out if you can sort through a large body of information, figure out what is important, and explain why it is important. Essay exams challenge you to come up with key course ideas and put them in your own words and to use the interpretive or analytical skills you’ve practiced in the course.
Instructors want to see whether:

  • You understand concepts that provide the basis for the course
  • You can use those concepts to interpret specific materials
  • You can make connections, see relationships, draw comparisons and contrasts
  • You can synthesize diverse information in support of an original assertion
  • You can justify your own evaluations based on appropriate criteria
  • You can argue your own opinions with convincing evidence
  • You can think critically and analytically about a subject

What essay questions require

Exam questions can reach pretty far into the course materials, so you cannot hope to do well on them if you do not keep up with the readings and assignments from the beginning of the course. The most successful essay exam takers are prepared for anything reasonable, and they probably have some intelligent guesses about the content of the exam before they take it. How can you be a prepared exam taker? Try some of the following suggestions during the semester:

  • Do the reading as the syllabus dictates; keeping up with the reading while the related concepts are being discussed in class saves you double the effort later.
  • Go to lectures (and put away your phone, the newspaper, and that crossword puzzle!).
  • Take careful notes that you’ll understand months later. If this is not your strong suit or the conventions for a particular discipline are different from what you are used to, ask your TA or the Learning Center for advice.
  • Participate in your discussion sections; this will help you absorb the material better so you don’t have to study as hard.
  • Organize small study groups with classmates to explore and review course materials throughout the semester. Others will catch things you might miss even when paying attention. This is not cheating. As long as what you write on the essay is your own work, formulating ideas and sharing notes is okay. In fact, it is a big part of the learning process.
  • As an exam approaches, find out what you can about the form it will take. This will help you forecast the questions that will be on the exam, and prepare for them.

These suggestions will save you lots of time and misery later. Remember that you can’t cram weeks of information into a single day or night of study. So why put yourself in that position?

Now let’s focus on studying for the exam. You’ll notice the following suggestions are all based on organizing your study materials into manageable chunks of related material. If you have a plan of attack, you’ll feel more confident and your answers will be more clear. Here are some tips: 

  • Don’t just memorize aimlessly; clarify the important issues of the course and use these issues to focus your understanding of specific facts and particular readings.
  • Try to organize and prioritize the information into a thematic pattern. Look at what you’ve studied and find a way to put things into related groups. Find the fundamental ideas that have been emphasized throughout the course and organize your notes into broad categories. Think about how different categories relate to each other.
  • Find out what you don’t know, but need to know, by making up test questions and trying to answer them. Studying in groups helps as well.

Taking the exam

Read the exam carefully

  • If you are given the entire exam at once and can determine your approach on your own, read the entire exam before you get started.
  • Look at how many points each part earns you, and find hints for how long your answers should be.
  • Figure out how much time you have and how best to use it. Write down the actual clock time that you expect to take in each section, and stick to it. This will help you avoid spending all your time on only one section. One strategy is to divide the available time according to percentage worth of the question. You don’t want to spend half of your time on something that is only worth one tenth of the total points.
  • As you read, make tentative choices of the questions you will answer (if you have a choice). Don’t just answer the first essay question you encounter. Instead, read through all of the options. Jot down really brief ideas for each question before deciding.
  • Remember that the easiest-looking question is not always as easy as it looks. Focus your attention on questions for which you can explain your answer most thoroughly, rather than settle on questions where you know the answer but can’t say why.

Analyze the questions

  • Decide what you are being asked to do. If you skim the question to find the main “topic” and then rush to grasp any related ideas you can recall, you may become flustered, lose concentration, and even go blank. Try looking closely at what the question is directing you to do, and try to understand the sort of writing that will be required.
  • Focus on what you do know about the question, not on what you don’t.
  • Look at the active verbs in the assignment—they tell you what you should be doing. We’ve included some of these below, with some suggestions on what they might mean. (For help with this sort of detective work, see the Writing Center handout titled Reading Assignments.)

Key terms

Information words, such as who, what, when, where, how, and why ask you to demonstrate what you know about the subject.
Information words may include:

  • define—give the subject’s meaning (according to someone or something). Sometimes you have to give more than one view on the subject’s meaning.
  • explain why/how—give reasons why or examples of how something happened.
  • illustrate—give descriptive examples of the subject and show how each is connected with the subject.
  • summarize—briefly cover the important ideas you learned about the subject.
  • trace—outline how something has changed or developed from an earlier time to its current form.
  • research—gather material from outside sources about the subject, often with the implication or requirement that you will analyze what you’ve found.

Relation words ask you to demonstrate how things are connected. Relation words may include:

  • compare—show how two or more things are similar (and, sometimes, different).
  • contrast—show how two or more things are dissimilar.
  • apply—use details that you’ve been given to demonstrate how an idea, theory, or concept works in a particular situation.
  • cause—show how one event or series of events made something else happen.
  • relate—show or describe the connections between things.

Interpretation words ask you to defend ideas of your own about the subject. Don’t see these words as requesting opinion alone (unless the assignment specifically says so), but as requiring opinion that is supported by concrete evidence. Remember examples, principles, definitions, or concepts from class or research and use them in your interpretation. Interpretation words may include:

  • prove, justify—give reasons or examples to demonstrate how or why something is the truth.
  • evaluate, respond, assess—state your opinion of the subject as good, bad, or some combination of the two, with examples and reasons (you may want to compare your subject to something else).
  • support—give reasons or evidence for something you believe (be sure to state clearly what it is that you believe).
  • synthesize—put two or more things together that haven’t been put together before; don’t just summarize one and then the other, and say that they are similar or different—you must provide a reason for putting them together (as opposed to compare and contrast—see above).
  • analyze—look closely at the components of something to figure out how it works, what it might mean, or why it is important.
  • argue—take a side and defend it (with proof) against the other side.

Plan your answers

Think about your time again. How much planning time you should take depends on how much time you have for each question and how many points each question is worth. Here are some general guidelines: 

  • For short-answer definitions and identifications, just take a few seconds. Skip over any you don’t recognize fairly quickly, and come back to them when another question jogs your memory.
  • For answers that require a paragraph or two, jot down several important ideas or specific examples that help to focus your thoughts.
  • For longer answers, you will need to develop a much more definite strategy of organization. You only have time for one draft, so allow a reasonable amount of time—as much as a quarter of the time you’ve allotted for the question—for making notes, determining a thesis, and developing an outline.
  • For questions with several parts (different requests or directions, a sequence of questions), make a list of the parts so that you do not miss or minimize one part. One way to be sure you answer them all is to number them in the question and in your outline.
  • You may have to try two or three outlines or clusters before you hit on a workable plan. But be realistic—you want a plan you can develop within the limited time allotted for your answer. Your outline will have to be selective—not everything you know, but what you know that you can state clearly and keep to the point in the time available.

Again, focus on what you do know about the question, not on what you don’t.

Writing your answers

As with planning, your strategy for writing depends on the length of your answer:

  • For short identifications and definitions, it is usually best to start with a general identifying statement and then move on to describe specific applications or explanations. Two sentences will almost always suffice, but make sure they are complete sentences. Find out whether the instructor wants definition alone, or definition and significance. Why is the identification term or object important?
  • For longer answers, begin by stating your forecasting statement or thesis clearly and explicitly. Strive for focus, simplicity, and clarity. In stating your point and developing your answers, you may want to use important course vocabulary words from the question. For example, if the question is, “How does wisteria function as a representation of memory in Faulkner’s Absalom, Absalom?” you may want to use the words wisteria, representation, memory, and Faulkner) in your thesis statement and answer. Use these important words or concepts throughout the answer.
  • If you have devised a promising outline for your answer, then you will be able to forecast your overall plan and its subpoints in your opening sentence. Forecasting impresses readers and has the very practical advantage of making your answer easier to read. Also, if you don’t finish writing, it tells your reader what you would have said if you had finished (and may get you partial points).
  • You might want to use briefer paragraphs than you ordinarily do and signal clear relations between paragraphs with transition phrases or sentences.
  • As you move ahead with the writing, you may think of new subpoints or ideas to include in the essay. Stop briefly to make a note of these on your original outline. If they are most appropriately inserted in a section you’ve already written, write them neatly in the margin, at the top of the page, or on the last page, with arrows or marks to alert the reader to where they fit in your answer. Be as neat and clear as possible.
  • Don’t pad your answer with irrelevancies and repetitions just to fill up space. Within the time available, write a comprehensive, specific answer.
  • Watch the clock carefully to ensure that you do not spend too much time on one answer. You must be realistic about the time constraints of an essay exam. If you write one dazzling answer on an exam with three equally-weighted required questions, you earn only 33 points—not enough to pass at most colleges. This may seem unfair, but keep in mind that instructors plan exams to be reasonably comprehensive. They want you to write about the course materials in two or three or more ways, not just one way. Hint: if you finish a half-hour essay in 10 minutes, you may need to develop some of your ideas more fully.
  • If you run out of time when you are writing an answer, jot down the remaining main ideas from your outline, just to show that you know the material and with more time could have continued your exposition.
  • Double-space to leave room for additions, and strike through errors or changes with one straight line (avoid erasing or scribbling over). Keep things as clean as possible. You never know what will earn you partial credit.
  • Write legibly and proofread. Remember that your instructor will likely be reading a large pile of exams. The more difficult they are to read, the more exasperated the instructor might become. Your instructor also cannot give you credit for what they cannot understand. A few minutes of careful proofreading can improve your grade.

Perhaps the most important thing to keep in mind in writing essay exams is that you have a limited amount of time and space in which to get across the knowledge you have acquired and your ability to use it. Essay exams are not the place to be subtle or vague. It’s okay to have an obvious structure, even the five-paragraph essay format you may have been taught in high school. Introduce your main idea, have several paragraphs of support—each with a single point defended by specific examples, and conclude with a restatement of your main point and its significance.

Some physiological tips

Just think—we expect athletes to practice constantly and use everything in their abilities and situations in order to achieve success. Yet, somehow many students are convinced that one day’s worth of studying, no sleep, and some well-placed compliments (“Gee, Dr. So-and-so, I really enjoyed your last lecture”) are good preparation for a test. Essay exams are like any other testing situation in life: you’ll do best if you are prepared for what is expected of you, have practiced doing it before, and have arrived in the best shape to do it.
You may not want to believe this, but it’s true: a good night’s sleep and a relaxed mind and body can do as much or more for you as any last-minute cram session. Colleges abound with tales of woe about students who slept through exams because they stayed up all night, wrote an essay on the wrong topic, forgot everything they studied, or freaked out in the exam and hyperventilated. If you are rested, breathing normally, and have brought along some healthy, energy-boosting snacks that you can eat or drink quietly, you are in a much better position to do a good job on the test. You aren’t going to write a good essay on something you figured out at 4 a.m. that morning. If you prepare yourself well throughout the semester, you don’t risk your whole grade on an overloaded, undernourished brain.

If for some reason you get yourself into this situation, take a minute every once in a while during the test to breathe deeply, stretch, and clear your brain. You need to be especially aware of the likelihood of errors, so check your essays thoroughly before you hand them in to make sure they answer the right questions and don’t have big oversights or mistakes (like saying “Hitler” when you really mean “Churchill”).

If you tend to go blank during exams, try studying in the same classroom in which the test will be given. Some research suggests that people attach ideas to their surroundings, so it might jog your memory to see the same things you were looking at while you studied.

Try good luck charms. Bring in something you associate with success or the support of your loved ones, and use it as a psychological boost.

Take all of the time you’ve been allotted. Reread, rework, and rethink your answers if you have extra time at the end, rather than giving up and handing the exam in the minute you’ve written your last sentence. Use every advantage you are given.

Remember that instructors do not want to see you trip up—they want to see you do well. With this in mind, try to relax and just do the best you can. The more you panic, the more mistakes you are liable to make. Put the test in perspective: will you die from a poor performance? Will you lose all of your friends? Will your entire future be destroyed? Remember: it’s just a test.

Works consulted

We consulted these works while writing this handout. This is not a comprehensive list of resources on the handout’s topic, and we encourage you to do your own research to find additional publications. Please do not use this list as a model for the format of your own reference list, as it may not match the citation style you are using. For guidance on formatting citations, please see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial. We revise these tips periodically and welcome feedback.

Axelrod, Rise B., and Charles R. Cooper. 2016. The St. Martin’s Guide to Writing, 11th ed. Boston: Bedford/St Martin’s.

Fowler, Ramsay H., and Jane E. Aaron. 2016. The Little, Brown Handbook, 13th ed. Boston: Pearson.

Gefvert, Constance J. 1988. The Confident Writer: A Norton Handbook, 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

Kirszner, Laurie G. 1988. Writing: A College Rhetoric, 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Lunsford, Andrea A. 2015. The St. Martin’s Handbook, 8th ed. Boston: Bedford/St Martin’s.

Woodman, Leonara, and Thomas P. Adler. 1988. The Writer’s Choices, 2nd ed. Northbrook, Illinois: Scott Foresman.


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License.
You may reproduce it for non-commercial use if you use the entire handout and attribute the source: The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

source : https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/essay-exams/

english101 ask alisha


 

Saturday, November 27, 2021

Grow Up? Not So Fast (Modified from Time magazine)

 Grow Up? Not So Fast (Modified from Time magazine)

By Lev Grossman

Michele, Ellen, Nathan, Corinne, Marcus and Jennie are friends. All of them live in Chicago. They go out three nights a week, sometimes more. Each of them has had several jobs since college; Ellen is on her 17th, counting internships. They don't own homes. They change apartments frequently. None of them are married, none have children. All of them are from 24 to 28 years old.

Thirty years ago, people like Michele, Ellen, Nathan, Corinne, Marcus and Jennie didn't exist, statistically speaking. Back then, the median age for an American woman to get married was 21. She had her first child at 22. Now it all takes longer. It's 25 for the wedding and 25 for baby. It appears to take young people longer to graduate from college, settle into careers and buy their first homes. What are they waiting for? Who are these permanent adolescents, these twentysomething Peter Pans? And why can't they grow up?

Everybody knows a few of them — full-grown men and women who still live with their parents, who dress and talk and party as they did in their teens, hopping from job to job and date to date, having fun but seemingly going nowhere. This isn't just a trend, a temporary fad or a generational hiccup. This is a much larger phenomenon, of a different kind and a different order.

Social scientists are starting to realize that a permanent shift has taken place in the way we live our lives. In the past, people moved from childhood to adolescence and from adolescence to adulthood, but today there is a new, intermediate phase along the way. The years from 18 until 25 and even beyond have become a distinct and separate life stage, a strange, transitionalnever-never land between adolescence and adulthood in which people stall for a few extra years, putting off the iron cage of adult responsibility that constantly threatens to crash down on them. They're betwixt and between. You could call them twixters.

Where did the twixters come from? And what's taking them so long to get where they're going? Some of the sociologists, psychologists and demographers who study this new life stage see it as a good thing. The twixters aren't lazy, the argument goes, they're reaping the fruit of decades of American affluence and social liberation. This new period is a chance for young people to savor the pleasures of irresponsibility, search their souls and choose their life paths. But more historically and economically minded scholars see it differently. They are worried that twixters aren't growing up because they can't. Those researchers fear that whatever cultural machinery used to turn kids into grownups has broken down, that society no longer provides young people with the moral backbone and the financial wherewithal to take their rightful places in the adult world. Could growing up be harder than it used to be?

Terri Apter, a psychologist at the University of Cambridge in England, became interested in the phenomenon when she noticed her students struggling and flailing more than usual after college. Parents were baffled when their expensively educated, otherwise well-adjusted 23-year-old children wound up sobbing in their old bedrooms, paralyzed by indecision. "Legally, they're adults, but they're on the threshold, the doorway to adulthood, and they're not going through it," Apter says. The percentage of 26-year-olds living with their parents has nearly doubled since 1970, from 11% to 20%, according to Bob Schoeni, a professor of economics and public policy at the University of Michigan.

Jeffrey Arnett, a developmental psychologist at the University of Maryland, favors "emerging adulthood" to describe this new demographic group, and the term is the title of his new book on the subject. His theme is that the twixters are misunderstood. It's too easy to write them off as overgrown children, he argues. Rather, he suggests, they're doing important work to get themselves ready for adulthood. "This is the one time of their lives when they're not responsible for anyone else or to anyone else," Arnett says. "So they have this wonderful freedom to really focus on their own lives and work on becoming the kind of person they want to be." In his view, what looks like incessant, hedonistic play is the twixters' way of trying on jobs and partners and personalities and making sure that when they do settle down, they do it the right way, their way. It's not that they don't take adulthood seriously; they take it so seriously, they're spending years carefully choosing the right path into it.

Twixters expect a lot more from a job than a paycheck. It's probably because of the way they were raised, by parents who came of age in the 1960s as the first generation determined to follow its bliss, who want their children to change the world the way they did. Maybe it has to do with advances in medicine. Twixters can reasonably expect to live into their 80s and beyond, so their working lives will be extended accordingly and when they choose a career, they know they'll be there for a while. But whatever the cause, twixters are looking for a sense of purpose and importance in their work, something that will add meaning to their lives, and many don't want to rest until they find it. "They're not just looking for a job," Arnett says. "They want something that's more like a calling, that's going to be an expression of their identity.

School Daze Matt Swann is 27. He took 6½ years to graduate from the University of Georgia. When he finally finished, he had a degree in cognitive science, which he describes as a wide-ranging interdisciplinary field. The value of his degree in today's job market is not clear. "Before the '90s maybe, it seemed like a smart guy could do a lot of things," Swann says. "Kids used to go to college to get educated. That's what I did, which I think now was a bit naive. Being smart after college doesn't really mean anything.

Swann graduated as a newly minted cognitive scientist, but the job he finally got a few months later was as a waiter in Atlanta. He waited tables for the next year and a half. It proved to be a blessing in disguise. Swann says he learned more real-world skills working in restaurants than he ever did in school. "It taught me how to deal with people. What you learn as a waiter is how to treat people fairly, especially when they're in a bad situation." That's especially valuable in his current job as an insurance-claims examiner.

There are several lessons about twixters to be learned from Swann's tale. One is that most colleges are seriously out of step with the real world in getting students ready to become workers in the postcollege world. Vocational schools like DeVry and Strayer, which focus on teaching practical skills, are seeing a mini-boom. Their enrollment grew 48% in a few years. More traditional schools are scrambling to give their courses a practical spin.

As colleges struggle to get their students ready for real-world jobs, they are charging more for what they deliver. The resulting debt is a major factor in keeping twixters from moving on and growing up. Recent college graduates owe 85% more in student loans than their counterparts of a decade ago, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research. In TIME's poll, 66% of those surveyed owed more than $10,000 when they graduated, and 5% owed more than $100,000. The longer it takes to pay off those loans, the longer it takes twixters to achieve the financial independence that's crucial to attaining an adult identity, not to mention the means to get out of their parents' house.

Meanwhile, those expensive, time-sucking college diplomas have become worth less than ever. So many more people go to college now — a 53% increase since 1970 — that the value of a degree on the job market has been diluted. The advantage in wages for college-degree holders hasn't risen significantly since the late 1990s, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. To compensate, a lot of twixters go back to school for graduate and professional degrees. Swann, for example, is planning to head back to business school to better his chances in the insurance game. But piling on extra degrees costs precious time and money and pushes adulthood even further into the future.

 

Thursday, November 18, 2021

lesson on the passive

 Lesson on the passive:

 

Here are some examples from several of the readings in our textbook:

In any case, the students themselves certainly don’t need to be tormented by their parents. 

It may be a good time to ask just how common such incidents are and whether “helicopter parenting” is as damaging as we’ve been led to believe. 

A group of senior citizens and youngsters are packing sack lunches that will be deliveredto the homeless. 

The contraption will need to be wrenched back from them.  

Interactive screens and Ipads are used more than printed material for reading, research and learning. 

Younger musicians, my contemporaries who have been called prodigies, feel slighted. 

 

Form of the passive:

Be + the past participle + optional “by agent” 

Usually, we use the passive without the "by agent". Notice the examples from above.

 

Uses for the passive:

1. when it is not necessary to mention the agent because the agent is obvious, not known, or not important.

Rice is grown in California. 

Our house was built in 1960.

A man was robbed last night.


Writing assignment 3

 Writing Assignment #3: 

We will do peer review of WA #3, paragraph #1 and the introductory paragraph during class on Tuesday, November 16.  We will do peer review of WA #3, paragraph #2 during class on Thursday, November 18. Be sure to have your first draft ready for peer review. The final draft of the writing assignment will be due to me by Saturday, November 27. 

Choose one of the following topics from "Grow Up? Not So Fast". 

You will write an introductory paragraph and two developmentalparagraphs on one of these topics. 

 1. After finishing university, should young adults live with their parents or should they leave home?  Why?  (You cannot write about helping parents.  The idea is that these are young adults and they have to think about their own lives. You also cannot write about getting advice from their parents.)     

  1. In your opinion, how can being a Twixter be harmful to a young adult? 
  2. In your opinion, how can being a Twixter be helpful to a young adult?

 

A. For the introductory paragraph:

 a. Include a hook to interest the reader.

 b. Write a thesis statement which directly responds to the prompt and contains the controlling ideas of the developmental paragraphs.

 c. Write at least 100 words. 

B. For each developmental paragraph: 

  1. Make sure it begins with a topic sentence and ends with a concluding sentence that rephrases the topic sentence.  
  2. Give both general and specific support. 
  3. Write between 200-250 words.Include word count.
  4. Be sure to edit carefully for correct grammar.
  5. Type and double-space.   
  6. Include at least two vocabulary words from any of the words you've learned this quarter from our textbook. Underline them. 
  7. Use at least two adjective clauses, two adverb clauses and two sentence connectors (however, therefore, etc).  Highlight them.

 

C. Also, there needs to be a transition word or phrase in the second developmental paragraph to show a connection between the paragraphs. 

D. For one paragraph, you need to include a paraphrase from the article, “Grow Up? Not So Fast”. You only need to include the last name of the author and the year the article was published. For example:  Grossman (2005) wrote that .....  Also, include a sentence which shows how your paraphrase supports your controlling idea. Include the original sentence from the article at the end of your writing assignment. 


Grow Up? Not So Fast (Modified from Time magazine)

 Grow Up? Not So Fast (Modified from Time magazine)

By Lev Grossman

Michele, Ellen, Nathan, Corinne, Marcus and Jennie are friends. All of them live in Chicago. They go out three nights a week, sometimes more. Each of them has had several jobs since college; Ellen is on her 17th, counting internships. They don't own homes. They change apartments frequently. None of them are married, none have children. All of them are from 24 to 28 years old.

Thirty years ago, people like Michele, Ellen, Nathan, Corinne, Marcus and Jennie didn't exist, statistically speaking. Back then, the median age for an American woman to get married was 21. She had her first child at 22. Now it all takes longer. It's 25 for the wedding and 25 for baby. It appears to take young people longer to graduate from college, settle into careers and buy their first homes. What are they waiting for? Who are these permanent adolescents, these twentysomething Peter Pans? And why can't they grow up?

Everybody knows a few of them — full-grown men and women who still live with their parents, who dress and talk and party as they did in their teens, hopping from job to job and date to date, having fun but seemingly going nowhere. This isn't just a trend, a temporary fad or a generational hiccup. This is a much larger phenomenon, of a different kind and a different order.

Social scientists are starting to realize that a permanent shift has taken place in the way we live our lives. In the past, people moved from childhood to adolescence and from adolescence to adulthood, but today there is a new, intermediate phase along the way. The years from 18 until 25 and even beyond have become a distinct and separate life stage, a strange, transitionalnever-never land between adolescence and adulthood in which people stall for a few extra years, putting off the iron cage of adult responsibility that constantly threatens to crash down on them. They're betwixt and between. You could call them twixters.

Where did the twixters come from? And what's taking them so long to get where they're going? Some of the sociologists, psychologists and demographers who study this new life stage see it as a good thing. The twixters aren't lazy, the argument goes, they're reaping the fruit of decades of American affluence and social liberation. This new period is a chance for young people to savor the pleasures of irresponsibility, search their souls and choose their life paths. But more historically and economically minded scholars see it differently. They are worried that twixters aren't growing up because they can't. Those researchers fear that whatever cultural machinery used to turn kids into grownups has broken down, that society no longer provides young people with the moral backbone and the financial wherewithal to take their rightful places in the adult world. Could growing up be harder than it used to be?

Terri Apter, a psychologist at the University of Cambridge in England, became interested in the phenomenon when she noticed her students struggling and flailing more than usual after college. Parents were baffled when their expensively educated, otherwise well-adjusted 23-year-old children wound up sobbing in their old bedrooms, paralyzed by indecision. "Legally, they're adults, but they're on the threshold, the doorway to adulthood, and they're not going through it," Apter says. The percentage of 26-year-olds living with their parents has nearly doubled since 1970, from 11% to 20%, according to Bob Schoeni, a professor of economics and public policy at the University of Michigan.

Jeffrey Arnett, a developmental psychologist at the University of Maryland, favors "emerging adulthood" to describe this new demographic group, and the term is the title of his new book on the subject. His theme is that the twixters are misunderstood. It's too easy to write them off as overgrown children, he argues. Rather, he suggests, they're doing important work to get themselves ready for adulthood. "This is the one time of their lives when they're not responsible for anyone else or to anyone else," Arnett says. "So they have this wonderful freedom to really focus on their own lives and work on becoming the kind of person they want to be." In his view, what looks like incessant, hedonistic play is the twixters' way of trying on jobs and partners and personalities and making sure that when they do settle down, they do it the right way, their way. It's not that they don't take adulthood seriously; they take it so seriously, they're spending years carefully choosing the right path into it.

Twixters expect a lot more from a job than a paycheck. It's probably because of the way they were raised, by parents who came of age in the 1960s as the first generation determined to follow its bliss, who want their children to change the world the way they did. Maybe it has to do with advances in medicine. Twixters can reasonably expect to live into their 80s and beyond, so their working lives will be extended accordingly and when they choose a career, they know they'll be there for a while. But whatever the cause, twixters are looking for a sense of purpose and importance in their work, something that will add meaning to their lives, and many don't want to rest until they find it. "They're not just looking for a job," Arnett says. "They want something that's more like a calling, that's going to be an expression of their identity.

School Daze Matt Swann is 27. He took 6½ years to graduate from the University of Georgia. When he finally finished, he had a degree in cognitive science, which he describes as a wide-ranging interdisciplinary field. The value of his degree in today's job market is not clear. "Before the '90s maybe, it seemed like a smart guy could do a lot of things," Swann says. "Kids used to go to college to get educated. That's what I did, which I think now was a bit naive. Being smart after college doesn't really mean anything.

Swann graduated as a newly minted cognitive scientist, but the job he finally got a few months later was as a waiter in Atlanta. He waited tables for the next year and a half. It proved to be a blessing in disguise. Swann says he learned more real-world skills working in restaurants than he ever did in school. "It taught me how to deal with people. What you learn as a waiter is how to treat people fairly, especially when they're in a bad situation." That's especially valuable in his current job as an insurance-claims examiner.

There are several lessons about twixters to be learned from Swann's tale. One is that most colleges are seriously out of step with the real world in getting students ready to become workers in the postcollege world. Vocational schools like DeVry and Strayer, which focus on teaching practical skills, are seeing a mini-boom. Their enrollment grew 48% in a few years. More traditional schools are scrambling to give their courses a practical spin.

As colleges struggle to get their students ready for real-world jobs, they are charging more for what they deliver. The resulting debt is a major factor in keeping twixters from moving on and growing up. Recent college graduates owe 85% more in student loans than their counterparts of a decade ago, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research. In TIME's poll, 66% of those surveyed owed more than $10,000 when they graduated, and 5% owed more than $100,000. The longer it takes to pay off those loans, the longer it takes twixters to achieve the financial independence that's crucial to attaining an adult identity, not to mention the means to get out of their parents' house.

Meanwhile, those expensive, time-sucking college diplomas have become worth less than ever. So many more people go to college now — a 53% increase since 1970 — that the value of a degree on the job market has been diluted. The advantage in wages for college-degree holders hasn't risen significantly since the late 1990s, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. To compensate, a lot of twixters go back to school for graduate and professional degrees. Swann, for example, is planning to head back to business school to better his chances in the insurance game. But piling on extra degrees costs precious time and money and pushes adulthood even further into the future.

 

tumutuous

  making a loud, confused noise; uproarious.